Like many women and men, you may struggle with excess fat or lack of definition in your abdomen.

Fortunately, there are a number of noninvasive body contouring solutions available that can help you sculpt your body without surgery, downtime, extreme diets, or lengthy gym sessions.

Emsculpt and CoolSculpting are two of the most-requested treatment options for healthy patients who want to take their bodies to the next level.

Continue reading as we compare Emsculpt vs. CoolSculpting in terms of results, comfort, time commitment, and candidates.

Emsculpt vs. CoolSculpting – Results

When it comes to Emsculpt vs. CoolSculpting, Emsculpt offers unprecedented results. The treatment uses high intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) energy to simultaneously burn fat and build muscle for a leaner and more toned physique.

Accordingly, patients can expect to achieve up to a 19 percent fat reduction and up to a 16 percent increase in muscle mass following a series of four Emsculpt sessions spaced two-to-three days apart.

These effects become evident within two-to-four weeks.

Emsculpt is also the world’s first and only nonsurgical butt lift and produces a firmer and rounder backside to improve overall shape.

Comparatively, CoolSculpting is only able to target subcutaneous fat and cannot strengthen or tone muscles.

Through a controlled cooling technology, CoolSculpting freezes and destroys up to 20-24 percent of fat cells. Results can be seen in six-to-12 weeks.

Emsculpt vs. CoolSculpting – Comfort

Emsculpt has been described as a virtually painless procedure. Most patients don’t feel much of anything during the treatment and may experience muscle soreness, similar to that of an intense workout, the following day.

On the other hand, CoolSculpting’s vacuum-assisted hand pieces have been known to cause a tugging and pulling sensation during treatment.

Additionally, the application of freezing temperatures can lead to burning, tingling, and numbness that can persist for several days to weeks.

Emsculpt vs. CoolSculpting – Time Commitment

An Emsculpt session takes just 30 minutes and requires zero downtime. In fact, patients often undergo treatment during their lunchbreak.

CoolSculpting can require up to 60 minutes per site, depending on the size and location of the treatment area. As a result, CoolSculpting requires a greater time commitment.

Emsculpt vs. CoolSculpting – Candidates

Ideal Emsculpt candidates are women and men who want to strengthen and firm their bodies through fat removal and muscle building.

Individuals considering CoolSculpting are often focused on fat reduction alone. Once they have debulked the area, they may wish to undergo Emsculpt to increase definition and tone.

Learn More About Non-Invasive Body Contouring

If you are considering Emsculpt vs. CoolSculpting, an in-person consultation is the best way to determine which option is right for you. Call our office today to schedule an appointment with one of our highly skilled and experienced providers.

Leave a comment